Government oversight is bad, but this "flagrantly violating the First Amendment" argument is pretty spicy. We can't just let people go uncensored and speak to each other freely, that's against the First Amendment!https://twitter.com/RonWyden/status/1141415506810998784 …
-
-
The point is that any censorship Twitter imposes is necessarily less effective at restricting the discourse than an editorial decision of a broadcaster when there were only four channels.
-
It feels like we're having two different arguments and I don't know how to bridge the gap here so I'll bow out.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.