There’s something grossly entitled about claiming you should have government-mandated access to roads* you didn’t create, maintained by people you oppose, and that you should have that access for free. *Or sub any good/service used by everyonehttps://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1136734307916140549 …
-
Show this thread
-
Yeah, we didn't "create" it, we only fund it via taxes (and tax exemptions), their unfettered access to our personal data and communications without any meaningful consent, and their unopposed blockades of any meaningful competition.
2 replies 4 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Seriously, this quasi-libertarian argument doesn't hold water. Being banned from a major social media platform is like being banned from an entire city; they better have a damned good reason and a clearcut and transparent appeals policy.
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Recursion_Agent
Funny how the woke-left’s “socialism” ends up being gentrification that’s just fine with privatizing what’s public. The neighborhood needs to be for them, and it doesn’t matter who (Daddy YouTube, President Yasss, a mob, the cops) shoos away the undesirables.
1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kellyramsey
Digital NIMBYISM. This entire debate should have ended with the invention of the block button.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻 Retweeted St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻
Old rant on this subject:https://twitter.com/St_Rev/status/614206867414364160 …
St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻 added,
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.