Would this be more palatable as subsidies/direct provision of necessities or as cash in hand?
-
-
-
To whom? Cash in hand would be much more helpful/less harmful but also probably impossible politically.
-
The whole point would be cutting out the intermediation of subsidy/direct provision, but the voters would be upset.
-
That does unfortunately track. You'll have the same people you do now making the same complaints that people are spending their money on things besides beans and sackcloth.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In large part because the UBI part was phrased in the most inflammatory way possible.
-
The whole thing is 'fuck you, Dad!'
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is there a glossary for this?

-
UBI = Universal Basic Income GND = Green New Deal Year Zero = Khmer Rouge razing Cambodia to the ground and murdering a third of its population Death-worship = Self-explanatory
-
Thx Hombre. ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.