feedback for ingroup/metarational twitter: imho UST/ingroup is biased in the direction of rationality/current scientific orthodoxy (despite attempting to transcend/include rationality) and overly averse to the value of 'the ineffable' / learning via direct experience thoughts?https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/924124150939099137 …
-
-
yes! i love his writing & have read a lot of it across his sites. i mentioned him elsewhere in this thread (https://twitter.com/_jordan_bates/status/1083132979352911872 …), noting that his project is legendary but that there is still a bit of a mysticism-allergy perhaps (?) but yea in general i'm seeking more Davids
-
*stares off into the sunset, murmuring to self & slowly shaking head* aren't we all, aren't we all
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I would go further and say that you can't do this work without being mildly bored and irritated by technical rationality and esotericism. Particularly the latter, which is mostly extremely bad.
-
Irritation is the essence of the path! (Somewhat seriously: it’s frequently stated in the tantras that mental clarity is the same energy as anger, when directed as conceptual confusion.)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.