What if more research and debate into vibrators is good?
-
-
-
Research is fine, but somehow I doubt these parasites are interested in making better vibrators. And there's nothing to debate. The correct response to moral entrepreneur-grifters is a sharp "This is none of your business, and you have no power here."
-
just made me realize how lucky we are the Problematic Patrol thus far leans (SW/T)ERF can you imagine the sheer Richter levels of insufferability we'd be subjected to with a porn-critiquing analogue of Anita, or the tedium of the cries for intersectional glory holes or whatever
-
tangential thought i realize but i am so not excited for whatever eventually causes the moral authoritarians to invade what is kinda the only remaining untouched landscape
-
Which would be...?
-
oh I'm thinking of just, porn and maybe a handful of directly porn-adjacent things
-
Dude, porn is THE focus of moral authoritarians, we're just in a weird lull
-
let me enjoy it in peace rev
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ok, I was going with “socialusts,” but “sanctimoaners” is several orders of magnitude above that. Highest approval.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
shh I want to see them debate a sex robot
-
my money's on the robot
-
maybe the Slate strike has started and this article is really from a scab Hot Takes Bot
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@CTZN5 A vibrator is considered a sex robot only when it is given those press on googly eyes. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.