tbf we could have killed a lot more people with a lot less money, if that was the goal. if you see my point?https://twitter.com/JeremyMcLellan/status/1063257947323736064 …
-
-
I think this is true about our human capital, but also about our non-human capital, btw.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
China can put a billion poor chumps in uniforms but their live-fire experience is minimal. I don't defend this thesis but I think it's the strategic reasoning.
-
I think there's definitely something I to this notion, but it's not the whole picture.
-
My point, though, is that projecting force around the globe such that you kill THAT guy, but not the guy standing next to him is difficult and expensive. A more who-gives-a-fuck ROE would have been cheaper.
-
So naturally hiring some greasy wop with a record to whack your wife because she won't stop breaking your balls or whatever is going to be cheap and easy and is a retarded comparison.
-
You don't have to transport the hitman halfway across the planet and drop him out of a 500 million dollar jet.
-
He lives on the same block, has his own tools, and got his training in the joint!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the point is to fund big defense companies "in case we have a real war" and what they make would actually be worth it. (And so they can make campaign contributions in any event.) Having combat veterans is a side effect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also a lot of truth in “fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here”. That’s not talking about the Al Talibaheddin.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.