-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mr_archenemy
This is a lie. Best estimate I've seen is 1/256 or more.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @mr_archenemy @St_Rev
Looking at Breitbart, it's just the first (or second) Globe correction. They later corrected their correction (again?) to between 1/64 and 1/1024 or something.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mr_archenemy
Yes, it's (w/high probability) between 1/64 and 1/1024. Which isn't the same as 1/1024. Most probable is 1/256 just from the longest segment, and (w/lesser probability) a bit more from other pieces. Which is consistent with having an admixed Cherokee ancestor more recently.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @mr_archenemy
Every fucking idiot decided this meant 1/1024 because, well, tribalism and lulz and people are fucking idiots.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev
to be fair to all the idiots out there, if that ancestor wasn't her mother, she's got a credibility problem, right? This is less about science and math than politics.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's consistent with an (ethnically) Cherokee great-great-grandmother (4 generations back), which is what she always claimed IIRC. eg: John Ross, Principal Chief of the Cherokee in the mid-19th century, was 7/8th white. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ross_(Cherokee_chief) …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.