My understanding of the GPL is that it’s no one’s... neither the creator’s nor the user’s. Once in the wild, it must stay that way. No one can take that ball and go home.
-
-
-
That's not something I'm qualified to comment on one way or the other. The rest of it, though...
-
It's hard to control the kernel itself but it's easy to control the process governing the kernel, which is what's happening now. This is a purge.
-
(relatively hard/easy, I mean)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's a divide between those who judge by our collective distance from perfection, and thus take progress and invention for granted ("not good enough yet!"), and those who judge based on progress from material baseline, and thus value innovation highly ("behold the wonder!").
-
And then there's the people who think fair is 'whatever I have, plus 50%'.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i'm pretty sure that Sharp did indeed write the USB 3.0 code for the linux kernel so idk how "freaks create, progs occupy" is a factor here...
-
That's one person who's already abandoned Linux as I understand it (and is the person who immediately called for the head of another major contributor), plus the author of the CoC, the Ada Initiative person and a bunch of other tech activists who've built little or nothing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.