Re: the Alex Jones thing. I think the most likely scenario is that there's an activist group who put Jones in their sights and negotiated the mass banning with the (friendly and amenable) web providers. 1/
-
Show this thread
-
They wrote a game plan, contacted friendly management and said, "Look, do it all together and 1) you make it look inevitable, which reduces the backlash, and 2) the backlash gets evenly divided between all of you." It's clearly a reply to Cernovich's operation against Gunn. 2/2
2 replies 13 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
"But crisis actors, but children, Alex Jones deserves it!" Sure. How long ago was the crisis actor rant? March. How long ago was the Gunn firing? Late last month. Cernovich has a hosting gig on Infowars. This is retaliation. The right takes a pawn, the left takes a bishop. 3/2
3 replies 18 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
REV WAS RIGHT AGAIN! (Infohazards: Salon, Amanda Marcotte, lots of disingenuous aw-shucks wherein a full-time People for the American Way employee bloviates about the innocent, uncalculated nature of his targeted pressure campaign.) 4/2 https://archive.fo/MfVzv
6 replies 15 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @St_Rev
“I guess I was a little bit offended that Alex Jones was able to get on the air and I wasn’t.”
@Steve_Sailer’s Law Of Female Journalism may have broader applications than we thought.1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
Nah, this is kayfabe.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.