FWIW I've considered her to be a raving, unhinged, vile bigot since 2014. And I think it's great that she's going to be on the NYT editorial board. Hell, elevate her to publisher. Cards on the table. Tell us how you really feel, honey.
-
Show this thread
-
The hilarious thing here is that NYT has inflicted a huge agree-and-amplify vulnerability on itself. From now on, *every single time* NYT posts an article or editorial like the one about New Hampshire being too white, it's going to be flooded with clips like this one:pic.twitter.com/hvtpDV2q6l
3 replies 14 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
NYT has presumed to interfere in the lives of people it despises for many decades. What it's losing is the circumspection that gave it plausible deniability; the exciting new talents revel in their contempt for the underclass. They don't understand where their power comes from.
0 replies 10 retweets 42 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable
St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻 Retweeted David Burge
Canonical formulationhttps://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/664089892599631872 …
St. Rev ☯️ 🏴 😻 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.