My point about progress being made by people rejecting/avoiding power relations. Unless you think there's a fixed amount of cargo in the world and all that matters is who grabs it.
-
-
This still has nothing to do with anything I said, and this repetition is boring.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Huemer explains this better than I can, but in short: Violent conflict is almost always negative-sum: the losing party loses more than the winning party gains. Frequently both parties lose, as from a fight over trivial stakes.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @woke8yearold and
Even when there's a winning party, that party expends resources on coercion, which functions as a tax on their winnings. Yet, mysteriously, the economy is vastly larger today than it ever was. The amount of knowledge available is many orders of magnitude greater than in the past
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @woke8yearold and
Where's all that wealth coming from? From people pursuing their interests, either under coercion (which is intrinsically wasteful) or freely. That's all. One infers the amount of relatively free production/intellectual progress from the accumulation over time.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @St_Rev @woke8yearold and
counterpoint: wealth creation requires a certain set of conditions like "barbarians aren't coming in to kill you just for kicks", call collectively "low entropy" creating low entropy typically requires force resources needed to exert that force need to come from somewhere
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
OK I'm done, tag me out please.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. Banned in Sweden. SubGenius, Zhuangist, white-hat troll. Defrocked mathematician. Brain problems.