Daniel Ingram has generously responded to my first three blog posts. His response is here: https://parletre.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/daniel-ingram-response/ …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @Meaningness @evantthompson @OortCloudAtlas @VincentHorn @redpillchange
It’s interesting. From a quick glance (and I will read more), my concern would be whether there is an adequate model of the personality that can be used to determine which practices are most appropriate for an individual at a given time. How does that work in this system?
-
-
That has always seemed to me to be something that is under-theorized in Buddhism.... more than anger/greed/delusion personality types.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn’t a prescriptive model, it’s a palette of possible directions. Where it’s enacted is in interpersonal practice. I share the theory but it’s of limited use without human relationships IME.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn’t describe what I’m doing as a standard system. I’m not trying to take some kind of philosophical metaphysical postulate about the nature of reality and then derive an awakening algorithm that will work for everyone. That’s way too reductive an approach IME.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.