Daniel Ingram has generously responded to my first three blog posts. His response is here: https://parletre.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/daniel-ingram-response/ …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @Meaningness @evantthompson @OortCloudAtlas @VincentHorn @redpillchange
-
-
-
Replying to @VincentHorn @non_buddhism and
It’s fascinating to me that that’s your interpretation of his response. Perhaps I should change my handle to SpeechlessSubject. :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpeakingSubject @non_buddhism and
Hey, it’s not everyday someone takes the time to thoroughly respond, with such care, to what, on the surface, seemed a fairly obtuse critique.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @VincentHorn @non_buddhism and
I suppose I’d also say what you call thorough I’d describe as obfuscating. But all in all, I suppose it shows that rational argument rarely changes people’s ideological commitments.
9:25 PM - 14 Aug 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.