Daniel Ingram has generously responded to my first three blog posts. His response is here: https://parletre.wordpress.com/2019/06/22/daniel-ingram-response/ …
@non_buddhism @Sciamanoinglese @Imperfectbuddha @Meaningness @evantthompson @OortCloudAtlas @VincentHorn @redpillchange
-
A generous demolishment.
It’s fascinating to me that that’s your interpretation of his response. Perhaps I should change my handle to SpeechlessSubject. :)
-
-
Hey, it’s not everyday someone takes the time to thoroughly respond, with such care, to what, on the surface, seemed a fairly obtuse critique.
-
That’s interesting. I certainly agree with you about the time and effort. Obtuse, not so much. I’ve heard from quite a few people since making that post who’ve said (my paraphrase here): “Yes, those styles of meditation made me even more alexithymic than I was before I began.”
- Još 6 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Lately I’ve been watching multiple SNB critiques come out about pragmatic dharma that are almost a decade behind our internal discussions of the same topics. And they’re framed as devestating critiques. :::sigh:::
-
I wasn’t aware of SNB when I made those posts. I don’t doubt that there has been internal discussion of these issues - it seems to be a “failure mode” (to use a phrase from a recent podcast) of the practice, even if conceptually accommodated in the underlying theory.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.