I have found myself in strong agreement with what @evantthompson has said in this discussion.
@_awbery_ and I have discussed this extensively for years. This on-going project emerges in part from that:https://vajrayananow.wordpress.com/2019/06/01/journaling-a-staged-path/ …
Let me see if I can clarify. How do you see the phenomenological experience that results from Dzogchen practice as interacting with meaning-making activity? Does that make sense?
-
-
This is difficult because I'm really not qualified to say anything about Dzogchen. Also any discussion of Dzogchen has to be highly personalized and I don't know you at all. Please discount accordingly. I'll try anyway >
-
"Meaning-making" sounds distressingly existentialist to me. Meaning lives in interaction. It's not an individual production. We can individually contribute to it a bit, but quantitatively we mainly experience it in flow, not make it deliberately.https://meaningness.com/metablog/meaningness-mountains …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
in 100 years; Dzogchen will probably be extinct.