Value of any "voting on electability or principle" question is limited by many of us thinking the person we most agree with is also likeliest to win. So I'm unscientifically curious, is the candidate you find most compelling similar as your judgment of the most electable?
-
-
I'm not saying I like him, but just the sheer amount of money he could throw at the election would be crazy. Which is terrible, but seems it could be a strength in the current system?
-
After the first $1 billion, more money seems to be wasted. Remember there are only about six swing states and none are in top media markets. Hillary had double the cash of Trump and it didn’t seem to matter.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.