.@NancyPelosi Really? Is that how it works? Wow. And then, lemme guess - you whip the vote then vote for real? #ThingsILearnedInCivics
-
-
-
@saramarietweets I wonder if she's going to read the bill - or just 'pass it and then see what's in it'? @NancyPelosi#YouCantFixStupid - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@NancyPelosi I hope they give you hell. This deal stinks.
-
@CorinneAM @NancyPelosi I flatly disagree. This deal does not stink. It's half-decent. -
@williambentley2 It's a deal for the sake of making a deal. Nothing more. -
@CorinneAM OK, as I understand it, the 'sake' in this case includes about 98.5% of people's federal income taxes not going up, plus UI, etc. -
@williambentley2 oh yes, let’s protect incomes up to $450k & index the estate tax to inflation, but not the minimum wage. This deal is weak. -
@CorinneAM@williambentley2 The move from 250k to 450k is sauce for the goose. Very good deal 4 Dems. Not sure if House Pubs will accept it. -
@Ptolemy_k not a v good deal for Dems. Why protect incomes over $250k? The deal is weak tea. -
@CorinneAM Obama can claim victory and willingness to compromise. Politically it's a "very good" deal. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@NancyPelosi a deal for its own sake is not it. Reject and return for more
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@NancyPelosi The only thing we have to fear is two more months of this fiscal cliff bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NancyPelosi Too bad you're not as worried about corporate entitlements as you are screwing us over. We did NOT vote for the cons policy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.