By refusing a permanent solution for 1.8 million of them. Yeah, you should be committed.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
- 3 more replies
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
-
That permanent solution was not acceptable. DREAMers should not be treated as hostages or bargaining chips, they should be granted a permanent solution NO STRINGS ATTATCHED
-
Then why did the Democrats support it at first? What a price to pay, agree to enforce current immigration law in order to protect nearly two million who entered illegally. Sorry but no, we are a nation of laws. Dem's could have stopped this. They chose not to, to have an issue.
-
They supported it before they found out about the last minute strings attatched
-
Last minute strings? You mean the wall he spent two years campaigning on? Face it, as usual the Dems only want a hot button. They couldn't care less about the dreamers, only the political capital they can provide.
-
The last-minute string was including the wall in the legislation. They were ready to sign onto it, then the wall was thrown in and they walked out, AS THEY SHOULD
-
Nonsense. Schumer agreed to the wall then backed out. You can spin it all you like but the Dems could have finally & permanently settled this issue and chose not to. Always got to keep a hot issue alive no matter who gets hurt.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Then why did you vote against the expansion of DACA by Trump
-
Because it came with a wall. We should pass a CLEAN DACA bill instead of using them as hostages
-
Has nothing to do with the wall. They just don't want Republicans to solve it because then those people are vote for Republican
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.