Anyone know why there's no first stage landing on this one?
-
-
-
Payload far too heavy + orbit too high. Takes too much fuel to get it there.
-
Interesting? This one is geo-stationary? If I remember correctly these launches require more fuel which call for drone landings.
-
Its also a bigger heavier one.
-
Yeah I guess that's the determining factor.
-
technically this was meant to launch on the Falcon Heavy but recently F9 improvements meant they could launch in expendable config.
-
Whooooaaaaa
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Good Luck, we're all counting on youpic.twitter.com/JqMwrY5rKZ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where are these launching from
-
Kennedy Space Center
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can I go to Mars ? I'm sick of this planet, this people.... I want to go to Marspic.twitter.com/pQ3ejPCFWz
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
soo if rockets go into space using combustible fuel...can you travel in space without it ? solar sails, or electricity ?
-
Yes, but the amount of thrust generated is minuscule, although more efficient, however solar sails present their own problems.
-
Sails would be cool with laser networks and reletavistic speeds. That's a hundreds of years from now, and quadrillions of $ later.
-
What we need is to make spaceflight more affordable and commercial, which will probably be done by 2060 or so, but that's just my guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
can i get a lift?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't worry, next time everything will be just fine :-).
-
Can I have that in writing ?
-
It would be nice, but you can't. That was just an expression of hope
.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.