What happens to a tradition after numerous small deviations? Clearly it isn’t the same. Art being the perfect and most relevant example. We went from mostly realism to the most abstract Rothko in a century because of ‘small’ deviations. Regardless of the value you place in...
I can understand that, but that mindset just seems like one stuck in the present and concerned with what’s happening *right now*. This imo is inconsistent with valuing tradition because it fails to look at the broader scope which is:
-
-
-
someone like Rothko’s works, certainly you must be able to understand the concept of permitted deviations and their eventual destruction of standards or traditions.
-
Of course that isn’t to say that classical art ceased to exist with the introduction of new concepts, but clearly the tradition and the standard of what was once considered art has severely deviated and warped. Regardless of what you think about this, the concept is irrefutable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.