The Private Company argument simply does not work, For Example, would you consider it just if Twitter just banned every left winger for hate speech and their only response to it was that they can simply go to a different social media page?
Abusive and threatening is pretty objective. If I routinely tell you that you are a subhuman because of your skin color, that is clearly abusive speech. If I threaten to kill you, that is clearly a threat. This is not complex, you are equivocating hard to defend this position.
-
-
Yes but as long as you are not threatening someone you should be able to say what you want, That should be the only limit to free speech which is exactly why i oppose 'hate speech' rules
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And you will also see that in this definition it is simply defined as hatred, I am sure even you can agree that Hatred is quite a broad term, almost any kind of insult under this definition could be considered hate speech
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.