When has that happenedhttps://twitter.com/berniesanders/status/989233125921353728 …
-
-
Replying to @tomcolicchio
Did you even read the article upon which these comments were made? The author & Bernie’s tweet are talking about the superdelegate system vis a vis the DNC.pic.twitter.com/YTmFe5NZT4
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @leftwardbound @tomcolicchio
It's still stupid. Overall, 4 million more people picked the better candidate. But if he really cared about an undemocratic system, he'd have posted an article about the difference between the WA caucus and primary. Bernie only cares about Bernie.https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/washington-primary-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton/484313/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SophieInCT @tomcolicchio
If you read the piece, it’s clear the author’s thesis (and Bernie’s explicit criticism via tweet) is about the current superdelegate rules & about 2020 onward.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
He should get rid of caucuses which are actually voter suppression
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JoseAB1207 @leftwardbound and
he doesn’t decide which states have caucuses, though - state Democratic parties make that decision. And in WA, voters are over caucuses (and 75% of WA caucus participants supported Sanders)https://www.google.com/amp/amp.thenewstribune.com/news/politics-government/article72715847.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Frisbeetarian @leftwardbound and
His supporters are the ones who run the states that have caucuses
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Blocked for putting Cenk the right wing incel in my timeline.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.