This is super misleading. It’s as if you are using ‘nature’ interchangeably with ‘reality’ or ‘material world’. A city is not an ecosystem in ecological terms, but only in systems theory. Ecologically speaking it’s a destroyed, dysfunctional, weakened, barren habitat.
-
-
-
(We both have anarchic hearts). A city is not a habitat, it’s like a beehive or anthill. But ants and bees don’t destroy the habitats their lives rely on to build their nests. Cities on the other hand destroy their local habitats so we need to create different ‘nest’ forms.
- Još 14 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Many forests have indeed been cultured by (often indigenous) people; does that make them not-nature?
-
What? Did you actually read what I wrote? Because it sounds like you got the exact opposite message from the one I tried to convey.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Arguing for the existence of cities is like arguing that nuclear power can be “done right”.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Every city is part of an ecosystem, just not the one bulldozed to make way for it.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I thought this work of art conveyed that line of thought particularly beautifully.https://twitter.com/orridge_anna/status/1129539726174838786?s=20 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
A swimming pool is not a lake. Lake is an ecosystem and is alive. all human inventions are dead. Comparing city and forest is like comparing raising a kid and teaching your Tamagotchi to shit on time.
-
"all human inventions are dead." <- fundamentally disagree. Alienation of human from nature is at the root of our problems. We are children of the universe and our creations are utterly natural.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
yes but no. humans are a breakthrough species, able to innovate and impact not only on multigenerational timescales, but on those of lifetimes. in addition, we are the first to recognize our own actions.
-
simply calling human impact 'nature' is misleading. our obligation to uphold the natural state of things in the face of severe ecological stress from humans is because the whole world is s dynamic system that we're toying with, snipping wires just to see what will happen.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.