Saifedean does not address me but as I understand he argues that a sound money would inspire "low time preference" aka savings. He goes on to suggest this a better result than the Keynesian high time preference money which inspires consumption this flies in the face of Smith
-
-
His argument is perfectly twisted to avoid the obvious observation that he cannot put proper conclusion to it without having plagiarized Nash. And that is all his work is, disguised plagiarism from someone that doesn't properly understand the economic implications of bitcoin
এই থ্রেডটি দেখানধন্যবাদ। আপনার সময়রেখাকে আরো ভালো করে তুলতে টুইটার এটিকে ব্যবহার করবে। পূর্বাবস্থায়পূর্বাবস্থায়
-
-
-
are the two mutually exclusive? Depending on individuals end at a given time, one could covet saving during some point in time and participate in markets during others (persuing another end)?
-
I think we would most rather that the most organic transactions happen as possible. Times in which people hoard are not conducive to production I think. What he has said so convoluted I can't believe he's not getting called out for it.
-
Yes and perhaps the most organic transactions are likely to happen when individuals sovereignty to do so is the high (& I think there's a relationship between having a low-time preference & increased sovereignty)
-
Increasing our sovereignty from what? Our own government that we created for ourselves? That is absurd. communist/marxist etc.
-
I don't think government necessarily I mean soverieign more as independent from many things like even to make your choices freely Ex. to encrypt messages (pass secrets) very easily Not a Marxist lol plus it's the direct opposite of soverieignty from the government
কথা-বার্তা শেষ
নতুন কথা-বার্তা -
-
-
There is no chance you claim to have better knowledge of economics than me.
-
Seems obvious at this point that I and most others in Bitcoin do, but I'm just here to mock and ridicule. I'll let
@saifedean defend his own work if he is so inclined. -
If you claim to have a better understanding, lemme know the books/schools you are familiar with so I can speak to what you know and vet you on it. He'll will never engage with me he'll lose his shirt.
-
Since your lack of reading comprehension is evident on multiple levels now, I'll repeat myself I'm _just_ here to ridicule, not to debate.
কথা-বার্তা শেষ
-
লোড হতে বেশ কিছুক্ষণ সময় নিচ্ছে।
টুইটার তার ক্ষমতার বাইরে চলে গেছে বা কোনো সাময়িক সমস্যার সম্মুখীন হয়েছে আবার চেষ্টা করুন বা আরও তথ্যের জন্য টুইটারের স্থিতি দেখুন।