Skepticism also blocks us from being scammed
-
-
-
Not if it blinds you. Do you feel rationally unbiased inquire does not protect you well enough from intellectual pitfall?
-
I'd say that anyone claiming to be "rationally unbiased" is well on their way to scamming themselves. About as close as one can expect get to this is to recognize, acknowledge and attempt to mediate their own biases. Which is no small task.
-
If there is a state of skepticism and a state of acceptance without skepticism...is there a state which doesn't involve either of this? A state of pure observation?
-
Are skepticism and acceptance dichotomies? Mutually exclusive? I see them as spectra that contribute to consensus reality. So to answer the question of the existence of a state of pure observation: absolutely? no; practically? yes.
-
Choiceless awareness. Pure observation. Can one ever function from this perspective? The question is the beginning of an inquiry which is the movement towards. How can skeptic ever approach choiceless awareness?pic.twitter.com/cAAUZXTCV2
-
Is evaluation not, to some extent, autonomic? Observation not a prerequisite to decision making? The challenge is deferring conscious evaluation -- and any skepticism -- to the decision making process, when a choice is required.
-
It is autonomic in a sense but if it can be separated then it is necessarily shown to be conditioning. The challenge prior to yours is seeing from a state that is free from bias. The decision/action that follows is what it autonomic. Observation should not imply evaluation.
- 2টি আরও উত্তর
নতুন কথা-বার্তা -
লোড হতে বেশ কিছুক্ষণ সময় নিচ্ছে।
টুইটার তার ক্ষমতার বাইরে চলে গেছে বা কোনো সাময়িক সমস্যার সম্মুখীন হয়েছে আবার চেষ্টা করুন বা আরও তথ্যের জন্য টুইটারের স্থিতি দেখুন।