Information that is "in the public interest", you can't get in trouble for leaking, if I understand that correctly. Does this qualify?
-
-
-
Oh you can get in trouble for it. But I argue the legality of a thing is less important than the morality of it. Which should matter more?
-
Morality, of course. Proper morales are what keep the Law and order working. (Not the tv show...)
-
Only when the laws and order are moral
-
That's the whole process. ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dude. Russia is protecting you. Don't even act as you care.
-
Attention. Snowden is protected by Russia. He doesn't care about the United States. He's no better than Assange.
-
How the HELL could you possibly know what is happening to Edward Snowden in Russia!? Unless, of course, you're Russian..
-
Yo. I'm sitting here in the US not worrying that a foreign entity is protecting me. Want proof?
-
Hahaha you should be worried
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The public had a need to know that DJT was NOT under investigation
-
Funny how that fact never leaked!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wake me up when there is a 'there', there.
#fakenews the Russia story is fiction, Hillary lost the election, don't give Russia so much cred. -
Tweet unavailable
-
Oh boy...
the knuckle dragging Neanderthal Cronies have merged from the underworld.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.





