That's the question many asked themselves after #podestaemails from @wikileaks - Establishment media said it's bad to know ^_^
-
-
-
Do any of us care what the "media" says. Is most of the "media" much different from a grocery store tabloid
-
Media shapes the public perception among those who haven't time to explore the truth outside TV, radio etc
-
Yes, I lived that way for years. So busy I'd get my info from wherever I could believing it was factual
-
Nobody is born aware and certainly not raised/educated at school to be like that (indoctrination/brainwash);one must escape it
-
Tough to escape something if you don't feel it's constraints. Facts are hard to come by these days. truth is elusive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
-
I would have answered absolutely yes, but I saw yes and got excited and clicked early
-
Tweet unavailable
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To what extend? I mean, what if that surveillance prevents bad things to happen, what if saves innocent people?
-
that's what you will be told happens every time, a politician is silenced, a union leader, an activist, a writer, etc.
-
I'd like to think that the surveillance prevents bad, horrible things to happen
-
dangerous way to think. More likely to be used to divide the masses and keep the corruption going on and on and on
-
Maybe you're right but I can't help but remember 9/11, the cost of no surveillance is far too great.
-
surveillance didn't stop Paris, or any other attacks. Btw, in Paris, unencrypted SMS was used
-
But has stopped many others, people please, don't misjudge me: It's innocent people on the line.
-
surveillance has stopped exactly 0 attacks from happening
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

