Edward Snowden
Kira Goldenberg
@Snowden wanna turn that thought into a guardian op-ed?
Democratizing information has never been more vital, and @Wikileaks has helped. But their hostility to even modest curation is a mistake.
-
-
- Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@kiragoldenberg@Snowden this post can be syndicated http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2016/07/28/on-weaponized-transparency/ …
-
-
-
@Snowden Opportunism won't earn you a pardon from Clinton & curation is not censorship of ruling party cash flows https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_curation … - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@wikileaks@Snowden Uncool, Wikileaks. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
.
@jennzen78 Why? Very reckless of@Snowden to undermine@wikileaks just as new#FBI 'espionage' probe re#DNCLeak authorised by#Obama - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks He's not undermining them. He's saying they need to accept when they've gone too far & not lash out (1) - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks (2) defensively every time something doesn't conform to their absolutist views. It's not a good look. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks I really don't like that this is happening, because I value what both parties do, but it is what it is. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks Anyway, I don't mean to put words in Ed's mouth; That's just my interpretation. I think division is bad. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks Everyone who values what WL and Snowden do to educate the public should remain united to fight bigger wars - Andere antwoorden bekijken
- Meer weergeven
-
-
-
@Snowden@Wikileaks Truth. Librarians know it’s all about the curation in the 21st century. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@jessamyn@Snowden@wikileaks Fellow librarian here. Not sure I understand what he means by "curation"...? - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@lisajpetrie It's a confusing mess but my take in this case is that it means "Being sure things are what you say they are" -
@jessamyn@lisajpetrie more like simply going through the leak and excluding personal information that isn't of public interest e.g. doxing. -
@lisajpetrie@paulmwatson@ggreenwald Yep, multiple issues. Curating could be grouping, redacting, or not-including. Good discussions! - Meer weergeven
-
-
@Snowden@wikileaks they've just become another ranty angry voice now. We've got plenty of those already. disappointed. -
-
@Snowden@wikileaks too easy for curation = agenda. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@PotluckPolitico Your hat in your pic disqualifies you as having anything worthwhile or even remotely intelligent to say.@Snowden - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden Judge the information, not the source. What they said is completely valid. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@KainYusanagi@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden ...including all the personal info of 100k++ Turks??? No - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@jag45209@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden Which is relevant to this how?https://twitter.com/PotluckPolitico/status/758759459787333632 … - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@KainYusanagi because@wikileaks published their info which could have been redacted out or "curated." Either way it is directly related. -
@simonlinsley@wikileaks Sorry, mis-linked there somehow. THIS is the one I wanted to ask how it's relevant to. https://twitter.com/Fisheswithfeet/status/758760432282640384 …Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar. - Meer weergeven
-
Alex Howard
WikiLeaks
Jenn Null
Bella Magnani
jessamyn west
Lisa Petrie
Paul Watson
Shitty Watercolour
Veronica Westville.
Fisheswithfeet
Kain Yusanagi
Joe
Simon Linsley
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of het ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.