@Snowden wanna turn that thought into a guardian op-ed?
-
-
- Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@kiragoldenberg@Snowden this post can be syndicated http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2016/07/28/on-weaponized-transparency/ …
-
-
-
@Snowden Opportunism won't earn you a pardon from Clinton & curation is not censorship of ruling party cash flows https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_curation … - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@wikileaks@Snowden Uncool, Wikileaks. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
.
@jennzen78 Why? Very reckless of@Snowden to undermine@wikileaks just as new#FBI 'espionage' probe re#DNCLeak authorised by#Obama - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks He's not undermining them. He's saying they need to accept when they've gone too far & not lash out (1) - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks (2) defensively every time something doesn't conform to their absolutist views. It's not a good look. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks I really don't like that this is happening, because I value what both parties do, but it is what it is. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks Anyway, I don't mean to put words in Ed's mouth; That's just my interpretation. I think division is bad. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@BellaMagnani@Snowden@wikileaks Everyone who values what WL and Snowden do to educate the public should remain united to fight bigger wars - Andere antwoorden bekijken
- Meer weergeven
-
-
-
@Snowden@Wikileaks Truth. Librarians know it’s all about the curation in the 21st century. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@jessamyn@Snowden@wikileaks Fellow librarian here. Not sure I understand what he means by "curation"...? - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@lisajpetrie It's a confusing mess but my take in this case is that it means "Being sure things are what you say they are" -
@jessamyn@lisajpetrie more like simply going through the leak and excluding personal information that isn't of public interest e.g. doxing. -
@lisajpetrie@paulmwatson@ggreenwald Yep, multiple issues. Curating could be grouping, redacting, or not-including. Good discussions! - Meer weergeven
-
-
@Snowden@wikileaks they've just become another ranty angry voice now. We've got plenty of those already. disappointed. -
-
@Snowden@wikileaks too easy for curation = agenda. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@PotluckPolitico Your hat in your pic disqualifies you as having anything worthwhile or even remotely intelligent to say.@Snowden - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden Judge the information, not the source. What they said is completely valid. - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@KainYusanagi@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden ...including all the personal info of 100k++ Turks??? No - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@jag45209@Fisheswithfeet@PotluckPolitico@Snowden Which is relevant to this how?https://twitter.com/PotluckPolitico/status/758759459787333632 … - Andere antwoorden bekijken
-
@KainYusanagi because@wikileaks published their info which could have been redacted out or "curated." Either way it is directly related. -
@simonlinsley@wikileaks Sorry, mis-linked there somehow. THIS is the one I wanted to ask how it's relevant to. https://twitter.com/Fisheswithfeet/status/758760432282640384 …Deze Tweet is niet beschikbaar. - Meer weergeven
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of het ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.
Edward Snowden
Kira Goldenberg
Alex Howard
WikiLeaks
Jenn Null
Bella Magnani
jessamyn west
Lisa Petrie
Paul Watson
Shitty Watercolour
Veronica Westville.
Fisheswithfeet
Kain Yusanagi
Joe