Edward SnowdenVerified account

Oh, no!! She'll cuss at them! She must be destroyed!! Are you that unfamiliar with politics, man??

DNC charter (bylaws) are that they shall remain impartial. You've missed the point completely.

Was Donna DNC chair at that time?

she was Vice-Chair during this time.

Are you sure? Link?

"Following Wasserman Schultz' installation as DNC chair, Brazile returned to her post as vice-chair." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Brazile …

Does it seem unreasonable or unusual for the party to be headed by a supporter of the nominee?

This 'supporter of the nominee' showed extreme & unprofessional bias in her roll at DNC. But you're excusing that. @Snowden

She certainly had a strong preference. But what did she actually do to “subvert” Sanders? I’m not seeing it.

No harm or foul game, which you can't prove?. If someone fired missiles at your house, but missed you'd be cool with that?

Still not seeing anything analogous to missiles. All this faux outrage would be better spent elsewhere.

That's your stated opinion. In case you're honestly that obtuse, though, I'll inform you the outrage isn't "faux" in the least.

I withdraw the “faux.”

There are numerous examples of her extreme bias here are 3-https://twitter.com/NotMeUs/status/757021294453862401 …

The blame for that lies with the DNC for not protecting their donors' private information!

Ah, "It was easy so that makes it OK". Like burglarizing is OK your home because your windows were not armored.

With rampant hacking today, they should've had better protections. I have a home alarm system, I lock my doors.

Uh huh. So burglars chainsaw your door open, loot your house, and quickly escape. That must be all your fault.

It's a moronic argument. Wikileaks claim to be heroes. They're not.

That's your opinion.I am extremely grateful to have proof that the DNC actively worked against my candidate.#demexit