with respect, numerous privacy researchers have told me that since 2013, Tor is now broken against a global passive adversary..... and that Five Eyes are now close enough to that vantage point that we need a new solution.
-
-
I wouldn't expect any system to be totally secure, much less remain secure forever in the face of adversary advances, but that's not the claim. Security is process of choosing between "less safe" and "more safe;" and continuing to fork toward safety until you reach "safe enough."
18 replies 249 proslijeđenih tweetova 766 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
Against a TLA, Tor (when used with particular care for what is being transmitted, and how, so as to limit the impact of bad exits and traffic analysis) was and is, in my opinion, far better protection than typical alternatives like static VPN tunnels.
8 replies 45 proslijeđenih tweetova 228 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
"Far better" doesn't imply "secure against TLA," it just means "more safe." "More safe," in isolation, often means "not safe enough," which is why we layer in protection for defense in depth. Even way back in prehistoric 2013, Tor was simply the outermost layer.
6 replies 27 proslijeđenih tweetova 187 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
All we know today is that at a certain point in time, old standbys like Tor, OTR, and GPG were "safe enough" for the given threat model, because they successfully protected the communications they needed to in the manner they were required to.
29 proslijeđenih tweetova 157 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
One day, they may no longer be safe enough. We don't know when that is until someone proves it: maybe it's today, maybe it's never. But none of the most common kinds of conspiracy-minded FUD we see raised against Tor today have been backed by anything more than air.
5 replies 41 proslijeđeni tweet 206 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
The primary threat facing someone trying to stay anonymous on the internet today is their own bad opsec, and that is precisely the same as it was in 2013. Tails—and Tor—reduced the number of ways anyone on my team could make dangerous mistakes, and so were crucial protections.
1 reply 57 proslijeđenih tweetova 206 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
If you look at the way post-2013 whistleblowers have been caught, it is clear the absolute most important thing you can do to maintain your anonymity is reduce the number of places in your operational activity where you can make mistakes. Tor and Tails still do precisely that.
78 proslijeđenih tweetova 228 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
If I were going to reprise my work in 2013 in a 2019 environment, I'd almost certainly still use Tor and Tails via different hacked WiFi APs for each communication. Even if traffic analysis reveals the origin of your communication, it doesn't need to lead back to you. Layers!
6 replies 88 proslijeđenih tweetova 297 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
You are talking too much about Tails! How about Qubes and Whonix, or even Qubes-Whonix?
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
I use Qubes and a Whonix gateway literally everyday, but you can't simply throw Qubes at a non-technical journalist and have them not get you arrested. Qubes is intended for people who understand how a network operates and what a virtual machine is. Most journalists don't.
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
I tried Qubes , hoping that i could install it in my media redaction. Impossible in fact, but i still like this os.
0 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @Snowden @toholdaquill i sljedećem broju korisnika:
So you're using whoonix inside of Qubes ?
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.