You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Update: the new i9 MacBook Pro doesn’t throttle under even the most stressful benchmarks. It gets mighty close… but doesn’t ever dip under base clock. Good job, Apple!pic.twitter.com/UkVVEM7bhn
Additional info: the “new” keyboard is even quieter than 2018 models with membrane, but has a very short and mushy throw. Feels worse. Also, I don’t know if it’s just my unit, but the Force Touch Trackpad feels and sounds terrible. More sibilant and less strong than my 2018 MBP.https://twitter.com/SnazzyQ/status/1131645760833970177 …
Thermal design seems mostly unchanged from the 2018 15” MacBook Pro i9.pic.twitter.com/jNXJucSu2J
Disagree. It depends on your workload. There are many fields that can take advantage of this new hardware.
Most average consumers shouldn’t even be buying a 15-inch MacBook Pro 
And most don’t.
Those temps are tooo high!
Those are what we call “Mac temps.” 
My MacBook runs at 99C while playing a 4K YouTube video 
Doesn't dip under base clock ≠ Doesn't throttle.
That’s actually exactly what thermal throttling means. Decreased boost clocks are normal—especially on multithreaded workloads. When used correctly, “throttling” means the chip exceeds safe operating temps and needs to reduce its core clock speed below its rated base clock.
I still don't understand the point of running powerful chips at base clock tho, why not just just have a slightly less powerful chip, maybe with less cores and let it boost up? Seems like a waste of resources except for the CPU cache maybe.
More heat, increased power usage, and variant boost speeds depending on individual chip binning and CPU load.
Does it really touch 5Ghz?
I got it to hit 4.85GHz on a single core for like 1 second lol
.. 4.85 is close.. Can blame silicone lottery I guess...with liquid metal though
...I know it's a hassle.. But do it for science.. pls 
Someone else had much better results for the same test you didhttps://www.reddit.com/r/macbookpro/comments/bs5x6q/apple_133_macbook_pro_w_touch_bar_intel_core_i5/?st=JW105511&sh=cc59b755 …
Did you intentionally post a spam link or…?
Damn it I never even copied that link! This should be the right onehttps://www.reddit.com/r/macbookpro/comments/bs6j1p/first_review_of_the_2019_mbp15_w_i9_9880h/?st=JW12MFVQ&sh=bfc97d90 …
Those are all lower than my results. Here’s mine. https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13242090
Does your MBP has the 2.4 Ghz? The one in the video was the 2.3 Ghz and its temps are in the high 80’s 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
