Zaremba et al. (as I know him 🤣) asks the timeline for self driving cars. makes a bold statement of two years for full self driving, three years for an order of magnitude better than humans. These gains are not binary, they can still be incremental even in driving.
Conversation
Continued Q re AGI - Exponentials seem to continue until they don't want hardware hitting limits (Moore's) far before requirements of human brain. Jim disagrees, that he has seen this fear in the past, but that the sheer force of humanity's progress keeps pushing hw forward.
Technology has continually been predicted to stop moving forward but that Jim plans to ignore that the rest of his life as it hasn't been true so far.
1
1
8
asks whether self driving cars will have unintended societal consequences - urban sprawl, ... Also questions whether progress in public transportation would be better. states that no one wants better public transportation if they can get personal cars.
6
13
22
... do we really want to open a new attack surface (ala Snow Crash ). Already concerned with modern ML being used at personalized scale against people when just armed with search history and vague interests, let alone my brain waves O_o
4
2
20
