I've made this point in a few interviews, but never on Twitter, so let me lay it out. Reasons not to have cis men play trans women:
-
-
-
First, there's the practical/economic one. It denies actual trans women opportunities, jobs, resources, which hurts entire community.
-
Then there's an aesthetic. Now, I agree, in principle, that anyone can play anyone. As an artist, I want that kind of freedom myself, but...
-
Having trans people play trans people allows for more informed, subtle, authentic performance. It makes for BETTER ART, which is the point.
-
There's a reason why
@HerStoryShow has resonated so much with trans people, why we love@Lavernecox,@MsJamieClayton,@angelicaross, etc. -
Eddie Redmayne, Jeffrey Tambor, Jared Leto, etc., are great actors, but we, and those who know us, see the difference between them & us.
-
Cis audiences reward them because they see being trans itself as a performance. Trans actors rather perform THE STORY, not our gender.
-
But all of this pales to the main reason not to have cis men play trans women. This is the reason that is making me cry as I type this...
-
It will result in violence against trans women. And that is not hyperbole, I mean it literally. Cis men playing trans women leads to death.
-
Here's why. I've spent years looking at violence against trans women, particularly who does it & why. I talk to survivors. There's a pattern
-
Straight men are attracted to trans women. They always have been, always will be. We are some of the most popular sex workers. It's a fact.
-
BUT they are afraid that being with trans women makes them gay/less masculine. They seek us out, enjoy us, then punish us for their anxiety.
-
Let's be more direct: They have sex with us, worry that makes them gay, then reassert their masculinity through violence aimed at us.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
It's so stupid at this point, like no one cares how some cis man is going to portray a trans woman. We're bored as hell!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
The problem is that the definition of trans is so broad that it has been reduced to a mere costume without standards.
-
This is patently not true.
-
Its true from my POV. You may offer another perspective from you POV. If I put a six down in front of you you are going to assume its 9
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There's a reason it is called "acting". It's clear they wanted a Big Name. Like casting Depp as Tonto.
-
If the excuse is they just wanna cast big names, how are trans actors supposed to become big names?
-
It's an explanation not an excuse. I don't argue that it is *right* only it may be their thought.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.