On circumcision, 'intactivists' are just wrong - latimes http://www.latimes.com/la-oe-allen-anti-circumcision-activists-20120812,0,2269752.story … The notion that circumcision reduces a man's sexual sensitivity has little basis in fact. Obsession with penis is the issue of the men in movement & their sex life.
-
-
Replying to @DrChaya
I suspect this whole circumcision discussion and the "bathroom bill" is a distraction thread for the Russian Troll farms. It's designed to divert focus off our goal of WOMEN'S RIGHTS: right to choose, childcare, equal pay, and paid maternity leave. Everything else is a sideshow
7 replies . 4 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @MerolaGeraldine @DrChaya
Interesting point. But the anti-circumcision foreskin fetishists are also very anti-science like the anti-vac'ers and climate change deniers. They refuse to acknowledge the medical/health benefits of a circumcised penis.
14 replies . 1 retweet 6 likes -
That is not true. I worked as a hospital based birth Doula for 18 years we are opposed to a surgery that is not needed without benefits that can harm new born babies. Circumcision also impacts breastfeeding and most the world does not do it.
3 replies . 0 retweets 11 likes -
Look, we all have our own professional opinions. I preferred not to circumcise my son, but I left the decision up to his Dad and my husband felt it would be socially advantageous. You have to fight the battles you need to win.
2 replies . 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MerolaGeraldine @marynoise and
It should be up to the individual who the penis belongs to
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like
Unless there is a diagnosed condition for it to solve.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.