1. Reality is not a game.
2. Evolution & general intelligence are not really game-theoretic.
3. The mind is not a machine.
4. Thinking isn’t computational; computation is something thinking sometimes does.
5. In life, there is no hardware / software distinction (h/t: @normonics).
-
Can you give us some salient passages or definitions that give us a sense for your perspective?
Papert advocates the computer as a tool for learning "procedural thinking", eg learning to detect and correct mental bugs. Here's about as direct a statement as I could find:pic.twitter.com/gC1L3CtrXV
-
-
1/2 Thanks for digging up this passage. I think this is actually consistent with what I said—thinking can’t be reduced to computation, computation is one thing thinking sometimes does. However, what’s at issue is what thinking actually is in its concrete state.
-
2/2 And this thing that thinking is is essentially bound up with values, judgments, emotions, and intuitions. What’s left after these aspects are cut off (always in the abstract) is no longer the thinking that living things do, but something quite different.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.