there are ways to say "enough" that do not involve blasting MORE ppl to kingdom come nor violating international law. what principle can we justifiably stand for this way? we violate the very norms we seek to enforce.
-
-
-
I hear you. And you are right in many ways. But non-use of chemical weapons is one of the very few lines that the international community has been willing to draw. It's not coherent. There are no good options. And yet the alternative is to allow the worst days of 20th c to return
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@samuelmoyn It would have been easy to just shut up & stay out of the fray. Not listening or debating does not help. I DON'T have good answers. But am at least willing to offer reasons for my views. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
The right thing by bombing a sovraign nation illegally to serve Israel. Sure.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You could do with a name change sweetheart, rather gives the game away...
-
Best today
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your statement is a moral and legal mess. Are you saying it because career considerations require you to say it ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Warmongers of the world unite!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
