If we also take your route of "proven by professionals" then police have confirmed the messages of a sexual nature to a 16yr old girl so by your own definition of guilty and by the actual definition,he is in fact very much guilty.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
So you reckon that police would take the word of a 16yr old girl on who these messages were from before issuing a statement?how very unprofessional that would be considering they knew this statement was being issued to press.time to tap into your common sense here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SkyeLan50477745 @ukbeautystyle and
Why would they reply to a question about Chris Ingham on a thread about Chris Ingham on twitter if who they were talking about wasn't Chris Ingham?they wouldnt reply at http://all.you are obviously lacking in common sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Are you speaking on behalf of Sussex police force there?do you know they didn't do "routine checks" that show they are real? You think they issued a statement on the word of a 16yr old kid?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.