I'm gonna preface every discussion I have about this game by asking the other person if they think Chronicle is canon, and if they say no and/or invoke that one BlizzCon, the conversation ends there.
-
People are under the impression that because something isn't wholly comprehensive (even if the stuff that wasn't in the book literally wasn't added to the game at the time), then everything inside it is now discardable.
I don't want to list names here but HUGE content creators who dismiss Chronicles does not help anything or anyone. I'm not even here to tell anyone to put their money down on the three volumes as I did. All I'm here to say is how good they are.
-
-
They’re canon until retconned. But— Devil’s Advocate: They were advertised as definitive lore. Lore Blizzard implied they were going to take seriously and stand by. Yet about a year later they were already experiencing retcons. It raises questions and doubts as to their validity.
-
The retcons are hardly retcons though. They're more so adding lore atop of the existing Chronicles. Which is bound to happen in a game that is ongoing.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.