She's no longer under anyone's control and her new reason for existing and "thriving" is to not go to Hell. Her goal of revenge turns into a goal of survival. And a very selfish one at that drives her to do very bad things. Far worse than what Arthas has ever done. --
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Going back to Arthas, yes he did terrible deeds but most of them were under the influence of Frostmourne and the Helm which (spoilers) are now revealed to be linked to the Jailer. Sylvanas doesn't really have that excuse anymore which is why "redemption" doesn't feel right.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 11 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
I think the problem that most people have is all of the things LEADING up to Frostmourne. I think that's the point no return ,but he had done a number of things call his morals into question before that (stratholme, the burning of the ships in the northrend expedition)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @tevruden
I think that we've got characters who have done far worse while in control of their actions though. Stratholme wasn't out of malice but out of stopping something horrible. Northrend is when things go south for Arthas that I'll agree.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @tevruden
- Killing the Mercenaries who he allied with - Burning the Ships of his Men - Lying to his men - Leaving Muradin behind Those are the crimes he did without Frostmourne and yes they're extremely messed up. But I don't know if he's irredeemable at that point. --
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
On its own, none of those things are irredeemable, but it calls into question just how corrupted he is once he takes up Frostmourne. Yes we know it takes his soul, given what he did to get it, but how far does it move the needle when he takes up the blade?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @tevruden
That really depends on whether you think Arthas picking up Frostmourne is still Arthas. To me that's Arthas possessed and taken. He's basically at the same state that DW is when DW was controlled by the Old Gods.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @tevruden
Personally I’ve always thought that it was still him. Yes his soul was ripped out but I don’t believe he was corrupted and controlled. I’ve always believed his actions were his own but I guess we’ll see if the Jailer had some kind of influence on him
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Lotus6194 @tevruden
I think that the moment he picked up Frostmourne he was lost to either Ner'zhul or the Jailer. We do have confirmation or at least a suspicion that Arthas held back the Scourge, what was left of him, from tearing apart Azeroth according to Uther.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @tevruden
It’s possible but honestly I don’t want them to just say it’s another corruption story and redeem him like he never did anything wrong and wasn’t in control of his actions
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Corruption storylines are quite common in World of Warcraft. And everyone still blames Arthas and holds him accountable in the lore anyways. I think if Arthas ever has the chance he won't go, "It wasn't me! It was that blade!" I think he'll ultimately blame himself.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @tevruden
I think it’s because there so common I don’t want them to do it here. He’s got a great story arc and I don’t want it ruined by saying none of it was really him. The corruption storyline feels overdone and it honestly worries me for what they’re doing to do with him
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.