Skoll Shorties

I say this as somebody who likes Maldraxxus' aesthetics, forsaken aesthetics, Lilian Voss, Nerubians, and spooky-skull-things. If they for whatever reason took those things away because of Calia then we've got a problem. I'm gonna give Calia a chance until then though.

If I was given the choice of who should lead and who should advise I'd prefer Voss to lead & Calia to advise. But Voss has every right to not want to lead as anyone. It's clear Voss works well as an adviser so as long as she sticks around we've nothing to fret hopefully.

We still have to remember: the majority of the Forsaken were from Lordaeron. The Menethil's are the rightful rulers of Lordaeron and there were a lot of Forsaken who would happily take Calia because of her lineage. There's a reason why Sylvanas saw her as a threat to her rule.

I'm just curious, where did you get that idea, that the first wave of the forsaken was dying in different conflicts so slowly, that after a decade of Sylvanas raising waves of mostly non-lordaeronians, those original ones, raised by Arthas, are still the majority?

It was a segment in Before the Storm. Calia goes to a meeting between humans and the forsaken, she's discovered to be the rightful heir to Lordaeron, and they try to join her because of her family's status.

Wait a moment? Sure, most of those who would be in the gathering could be lordaeronians because they were separated with somebody. Does it represent all? Plus some forsaken wanted to join their families in the alliance and saw her as their opportunity to do so. Not to crown her.

Remember: when Sylvanas began conquering land in Cataclysm, she engulfed much of Lordaeron's old borders, giving her crypts (and their deceased) that belonged to Lordaeron. I'm sure there are many Forsaken aren't from Lordaeron, but Sylvanas' main bulwark is lordaeronian.