Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
I'm just curious, where did you get that idea, that the first wave of the forsaken was dying in different conflicts so slowly, that after a decade of Sylvanas raising waves of mostly non-lordaeronians, those original ones, raised by Arthas, are still the majority?
I think even factoring in the amount of Forsaken raised throughout World of Warcraft and Warcraft the vast majority of the Forsaken people are still of Lordaeron. Arthas took down an entire kingdom and then raised it. Sylvanas or anyone else has yet to do something similar.
True, but how many he took with him to Northrend? Plus how many remained a mindless scourge? In classic, territories controlled by the forsaken are miniscule in comparison to how much is occupied by the scourge. So we would be talking not all who were raised, but just a fraction.
Arthas didn't take that many with him to Northrend due to the control he had over the scourge was wavering. Plus Sylvanas made it her goal to free any controlled by the LK to place into the Forsaken. Most of her forces came from the Northern parts of the Kingdoms (aka Lordaeron)
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
