Skoll Shorties

I don't think a character is interesting depending on whether they're good or bad. They're interesting on what they do or act in a story. A character that demeans you and is constantly berating you isn't fun or interesting to me. Sorry, Sylvanas and Nathanos fans.

I mean I'm pretty sure his appeal has always been that he's clearly the biggest victim of Sylvanas' abusive power structure. The guy is literally in the world's worst abusive relationship and the intrigue was seeing him break out of it. But oh well, no interesting stories allowed

I don't think we were going to get a storyline where others help him or saved him when nobody likes the guy. There's plenty of time for him to change his mind in Shadowlands still. But this is a fitting end to a character who's still loyal to Sylvanas.

Eh....... Its just disappointingly bad writing and doesn't leave a good taste to have a guy stuck in an abusive relationship just... Go down like that. He was robbed of better introspection.

Nobody in the Horde or Alliance was gonna help him out at that given point. It would be bad writing if suddenly or randomly a character would go, "We should try and change Nathanos' mind about his loyalties to Sylvanas!" And again he still can have that arc in the Shadowlands.

Right. Because we have no characters in the Horde or the Alliance who were previously in service of enemies... Who have experience in cults and trying to deprogram from them. How preposterous to imagine anyone thinking that's possible. Didn't Sira get killed? Lol.

The difference is we had characters reach out or try to change. Nathanos had neither of those all he had was moments of possible doubt but never acted on them.

Sira... Reached out and tried to change? In what way? The end literally finds her in a cell with the kaldorei saying they're gonna try to work to fix her. I see no reason the same couldn't be done by the forsaken, especially Lilian *and* Calia with Nathanos.