Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
This flip-flopping of back and forth between Not-So-Evil and Evil can really hurt on what you're trying to portray for a villain, anti-hero, or hero. Sylvanas was shown in Legion to care about the Horde to some degree and then BfA turns around and throws that away.
Sylvanas should be a villain and they should have fun with it. Instead of going back and forth and remaining undecided on what she is for Warcraft. Gul'dan, Garrosh, Azshara, the Lich King all really fun villains who got to have fun being villains.
Gul'dan was the best villain who deserved better.
I gotta disagree with garrosh being a 'fun' villain but other than that this thread is *chefs kiss*
A lot of what Garrosh did as a villain led to the story we have today. Garrosh not in Mists of Pandaria does indeed ruin the story quite a bit and it is after all my favorite expansion. I found him enjoyable as an Antagonist for the Horde and the Alliance.
The biggest mistake was trying to humanize a character that lost her humanity (or elfanity) a long time ago. Plus, she really didn't have to become Warchief for everything to play out like it did. It's my biggest complaint of the last few expansions.
I agree wholeheartedly. We easily could've had the Horde divide. Have it so Sylvanas encourages the Horde to defect for war against Vol'jin who wants peace. Like a Dark Rebellion so to speak.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
