There is a clear difference between BfA Sylvanas and Legion Sylvanas but there is also a clear difference between all of her iterations honestly. But even with Legion it made it pretty clear what Sylvanas was willing to do to achieve her goals.https://twitter.com/makaniart/status/1279647959450136579 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Legion was doing it's best to market Sylvanas as a hero-character when in reality she was never really that. Sylvanas up until BfA was always in the middle of being bad & good a very dark Anti-Hero. Classic even made it pretty clear the Horde was a means an end for her.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 4 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Wrath was about her revenge. Cata was about her new goal. Legion showed us the merits to that goal but also her new position as Warchief - a position she should've never had. BfA could've done a better job but I do think she was always intended to be a villain at some point.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Reading that thread made me gag. They act like pre Cata Sylvanas was better or somehow less dark. IGNORING THE FACT SHE CHANGED HER GOALS...very normal thing to do. I mean Sylvanas endorsed a Plague to kill the living. OF COURSE SHE ENDS UP BAD. *Sigh*
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Sylvanas is very much a villainous character. She was always dark, always cunning, and always one step away from the Lich King. Her only redeeming quality was that she cared for the Forsaken to some degree and even that was for selfish reasons really.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.