Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
Legion was doing it's best to market Sylvanas as a hero-character when in reality she was never really that. Sylvanas up until BfA was always in the middle of being bad & good a very dark Anti-Hero. Classic even made it pretty clear the Horde was a means an end for her.
Wrath was about her revenge. Cata was about her new goal. Legion showed us the merits to that goal but also her new position as Warchief - a position she should've never had. BfA could've done a better job but I do think she was always intended to be a villain at some point.
This flip-flopping of back and forth between Not-So-Evil and Evil can really hurt on what you're trying to portray for a villain, anti-hero, or hero. Sylvanas was shown in Legion to care about the Horde to some degree and then BfA turns around and throws that away.
Sylvanas should be a villain and they should have fun with it. Instead of going back and forth and remaining undecided on what she is for Warcraft. Gul'dan, Garrosh, Azshara, the Lich King all really fun villains who got to have fun being villains.
Reading that thread made me gag. They act like pre Cata Sylvanas was better or somehow less dark. IGNORING THE FACT SHE CHANGED HER GOALS...very normal thing to do. I mean Sylvanas endorsed a Plague to kill the living. OF COURSE SHE ENDS UP BAD. *Sigh*
Sylvanas is very much a villainous character. She was always dark, always cunning, and always one step away from the Lich King. Her only redeeming quality was that she cared for the Forsaken to some degree and even that was for selfish reasons really.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
