Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
It's very VERY easy to make this "middle ground" that non-Forsaken players want without outright inserting Calia on the throne. Calia doesn't represent a middle ground. She represents the polar opposite. People like Lilian or Faol are a middle ground.
Faol and Voss don't want to take up that position at all and that's where Calia comes in. Calia doesn't want the throne either but Forsaken NPCs express that they want her to lead and be there for them. She has Voss and Faol as advisers so that's how this can all work.
Skoll. It's not "Faol and Voss don't want to" it's the writers don't want those characters to do so. Their choices are just as much indicative of author bias as they are of genuine motivation. Forsaken expressing how bad they want her is again, a writer choice.
Faol and Voss have been written that way to not want to lead with the Forsaken. It is a writer's choice. We've had a writer's choice in Warcraft's lore for years now. Not everything the writers are gonna do are gonna make the players happy in a story. That's any given story.
And from a written perspective, why should Lilian and Alonsus be relegated to "aid" category to bolster Calia's character arc instead of the other way around? Why should they be the accessories to her story instead of the other way around? That's what I'm challenging.
Honestly it would be super easy to write a situation where Voss decides she's needed for leadership. Waaaaay fucking easier than fitting the square peg that is Calia into the Forsaken's round hole. They're just examples, anyway. Quite literally almost any Forsaken character-
-fits better than Calia.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
