I wonder if people would be throwing their over Calia if she was a character since Cataclysm. Seems one of the issues is she's barely in the game and they don't feel like they need to read the books.
Pokaż ten wątek
-
While huge lore events in books is a big issue for games like Warcraft, Halo, etc. It's nothing new and has been something Blizzard has been doing for a while now. Baine was established as leader of the Tauren in Shattering. As was Garrosh. As was the Council of Three Hammers.
Pokaż ten wątek
I honestly think people would still take issue with Calia even if she was in say Shattering or Cataclysm or any of the previous expansions. I think it really just comes down to she's not Sylvanas. Just like Garrosh wasn't Thrall or Anduin isn't Varian.
-
-
People despise change. I didn't like Cairne dying, I didn't like Thrall leaving Garrosh in charge. But did it get the story going? Did it get me invested? Yes. And I honestly see Calia as a change the Forsaken -EXTREMELY- need as Zelling and her were very nice additions.
Pokaż ten wątekDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
People want to see the leader as a character who has been with the forsaken all along. They want Helcular,Faranell, Velonara or Belmont. Who is the forsaken, not in form, but in spirit.
-
The issue with some of those characters is that they're not going to fit with the way the Horde is run. Velonara and maybe Helcular are the only ones I can maybe see be in a high position of the Forsaken. But Faranell and Belmont are likely with Sylvanas and not the Horde.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.