Skoll Shorties

Dude, again, I don’t play Forsaken. I don’t know how I can prove that. All I know, is how alot of Forsaken players feel about having a character so directly oppositional to the historical themes of the race. There are many better ways to handle the situation.

And I’m telling you that using the loudest voices on the forums is a terrible way to pretend that that represents with all players of anything wants. I’ve seen just as many, using your nebulous argument saying the opposite

Bro, there’s nothing “nebulous” about my argument. I’m simply pointing out the potentially harmful implications on the Forsaken fantasy that such a jarring change in the representation of the race could present.

So we haven’t even seen how she would be a leader to these people yet, you’re just assuming she’s going to be somehow the most pure leader ever and even demand that from her people

That’s literally all we’ve seen of the character since she became “undead”. She has been shown as nothing but a saint. She cures Dereks delirium, she’s helping Delaryn and undead Nelves cope, she’s literally undead Oprah.

Ok...? So tell me why having a leader who actually bothers helping their people as a bad thing? It’s not edgy to just leave her depressed and suffering people depressed and suffering, it’s called being an asshole

Because what’s the point if she doesn’t at all identify or accurately represent the people she is being set to lead? That’s like having Magatha as the leader of the Bloodhoof Tauren, a historically pacifistic and gentle people, being led by a ruthless, vile, crone.

Except that she does? Which they go out of their way to show, once again, in the novel. And then in the game and 8.3. In fact, most of the ones who are not like her or sympathetic toward her actions left with sylvanas.