She shouldn’t be there at all, though. She’s not a Horde character, they’d be better off sticking with Voss as the Forsaken stand-in as they been. Calia is nowhere NEAR that point yet where she can stand there and rep the Forsaken.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Pyrogar1 @Skoll_Shorties
The problem is they really don’t have any major forsaken characters to fill that role. People are saying Lillian, but I guess they forgot that most of her story was her talking about how she hates being undead
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Calia has been around being pro forsaken for as long as Lillian has been suddenly pro forsaken. Arguably more because lilian wasn’t in before the storm advocating for the forsaken
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9 @Skoll_Shorties
No she hasn’t. She’s barely even Forsaken. Nothing about her character represents a single thing the Forsaken have stood for. Sure they were misguided under Sylvanas, but Calia is NOT the answer. She is completely antithetical to the dark and dubious nature Forsaken.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Pyrogar1 @Necroxis9
The dark and dubious nature of the Forsaken isn't gonna last much more with the way the Horde is going. You can't really expect that to stick around for them when it's exactly what the Horde is now trying to avoid.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Necroxis9
... but being lead by a literal anomaly of undeath, groomed by the Alliance, and who never suffered the same hardships as a vast majority of them is simply not the way.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Pyrogar1 @Necroxis9
Calia: - Lost her family. - Died. She might not be a very old Forsaken but she's still had suffering and most importantly cares about the Forsaken. And once again she's clearly being groomed by Voss more than the Alliance to be their Queen.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Necroxis9
Calia has experienced neither of these. She was quickly found and “adopted” by Alonsus Faol when Lordaeron fell and was immdeiately reaccepted by her friends when she was killed by Sylvanas and raised as “undead”. She was at no point “Forsaken”.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Pyrogar1 @Skoll_Shorties
She was a royal of the people that used to rule them, all of whom they really loved except one of them. I don’t know how many more times because it can tell you guys that the forsaken for the most part still really love the menethils except for arthas obviously
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9 @Skoll_Shorties
Again, they’re taking a race known for it’s dark, gothic, and edgy themes and plopping a character into their leadership position who represents the complete opposite of that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Just because their leader doesn't embody the "dark, gothic, and edgy themes" doesn't mean those go away. And even if they do: that's a good thing. The Forsaken shouldn't be relying on those dark thoughts anymore in the first place. Elsewise there is no reason for them to stick.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.