Without getting into "What if"s, what we have there comes down to what's honorable and fair, that's the basis of Mak'gora; a "Duel of Honor". What happened in first fights between Garrosh and Thrall was: When fight was "fair" and equal, Garrosh was winning, 1/2
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath @Skoll_Shorties
But both of those fights got interrupted with external reasons. At Nagrand though, what Thrall did was not fair, that's why it is cheating, not because of magic, but because he used magic unfairly, even he himself knows it and feels guilty about it. 2/2 (bonus self quote ;b)pic.twitter.com/paXgnUPOmm
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
I view that Garrosh saw the weapon that Thrall was holding but knew he wasn't going to use it right away. Thrall is a shaman and him wielding the elements is no secret. Garry has defeated Thrall despite those elemental powers and had no issue with him using it because of that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
He's not going to have a surprise Pikachu Face when fighting Thrall and all of a sudden Thrall starts using the elements when he's about to lose. That's extremely practical and honestly expected for a fight that they've had MULTIPLE TIMES NOW.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
I would only say Thrall cheated if Garrosh said no elemental powers and that they were only allowed one weapon. The fact of the matter is one weapon is not an over-arching rule it's a rule you can give if you want to which clearly neither of them have said in previous matches.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
At this point, I think we're just going to go in circles. I don't think he cheated and that's really that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
You are going in circles of denial, refuse to read an objective statement. As I said, I do love Thrall, but he cheated and that was the main theme of him dropping Doomhammer and giving it to players, his guilt. I'm sorry, but that's really that <:)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
I read what you said and I disagree with it just as you're disagreeing with me in what I am saying. That's just that. That's the internet and I can deal with that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Alright, no need to be mad about a simple smiley because someone does not agree with you, on the contrary it was there to soften things down. Anyways, as I said, what I said was not my view to be disagreed, it's based on objective lore facts and what's written and happened. 1/2
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath @Skoll_Shorties
You disagreeing to a lore fact does not make it go away. It won't change Thrall's guilt and why he let go of Doomhammer and why he wasn't able to reconnect with elements. Again, him being dishonorable and his guilt is the reason and this is why. Agree or not. 2/2
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Saying something that is a "lore fact" that doesn't even exist doesn't make it a lore fact though. Thrall is guilty about Garrosh and what circled around in the events of Garrosh's reign entirely not just their mak'gora. He blames himself.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Thrall: "Doomhammer... it was like a dead weight in my hands. The elements were silent. It has been this way since I used it to slay Garrosh." ^ Lore fact. Which part of this is him blaming himself about Garrosh's reign? Really? Source Questline:https://wow.gamepedia.com/The_Hammer_in_the_Deep#Stage_3:_Hot_on_the_Trail …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
We're talking about two different things now. How Thrall feels about the situation and how the world feels about the situation. Thrall sees himself as someone who is guilty while everyone else sees him as somebody who did right. The elements being used wasn't dishonorable.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.